Monday, July 28, 2008

Fitch Updates Ratings Model; Projects Steep Housing Price Declines (25% and more). San Diego and San Francisco to decline by more than 30%.

http://www.housingwire.com/2008/07/24/fitch-updates-ratings-model-projects-steep-price-declines/

Fitch Ratings said Thursday that it had enhanced its U.S. residential mortgage loss model, called ResiLogic, a key component of the agency's overall approach to assessing U.S. RMBS new-issue ratings. While the new-issue market has been essentially dead for all of 2008, Fitch's revisions suggest that the agency is preparing for where the market might be headed next: seasoned mortgage issuance.

They also suggest a very bearish take on housing prices over the next five years: Fitch said in its report that it is expecting home prices to decline by an average of 25 percent in real terms at the national level over the next five years, starting from the second quarter of 2008.

And that's the base case scenario.

Seasoned securitizations?

In face of those sort of expectations for housing, more than a few market participants have suggested to HW as of late that in order for the battered securitization market to regain its footing, it may have to revert back to issuing deals only for mortgages that have already been "seasoned."

Seasoning refers to the usual pattern of increasing defaults during the first 24 months of a deal's life; so-called "seasoned deals" typically exhibit much more stable and predictable default patterns.

While the updates to ResiLogic cover other areas, it's Fitch's addition of the ability to analyze seasoned loans and to take into account loan payment history and house price changes since loan origination that are probably the most telling, at least in terms of where the securitization market is headed next.

"The ability to look at seasoned loans through ResiLogic is significant because the dearth of new mortgage origination has placed emphasis on the securitization of seasoned loans," said Huxley Somerville, group managing director and head of Fitch's U.S. RMBS group. "To rate transactions with seasoned loans, it is imperative to understand how they are performing in the current environment."

Fitch will also roll out new 25 MSA-level risk factors influencing frequency of foreclosure and loss severity estimates, the agency said; the 25 MSAs chosen are those that have exhibited strong non-conforming mortgage lending activity in the past.

"Some MSAs such as San Diego and San Francisco, CA are expected to experience home price declines by as much as 47 percent and 33 percent over the next five years, while home prices in MSAs such as San Antonio, TX are expected to appreciate by 7 percent," Somerville said.

"The home price forecasts are embedded in the state and MSA level risk indicators and will be updated quarterly."

For many investors, the updates come too late to salvage existing deals; but it's clear that the agency has become much more bearish on prospects in the primary housing market.


Blogged with MessageDance using Gmail

Thursday, July 10, 2008

10 Stocks To Watch, Only Freddie Mac & Fannie Mae looks Interesting

If by 'interesting' this joker means FAIL


10 Stocks To Watch, Only Freddie Mac & Fannie Mae looks Interesting
istockAnalyst.com - 2 hours ago
You really gotta understand how slaughtered people are getting right now - illiquid positions , leverage and a lack of joke of an industry transparency have combined to create the perfect storm ...



Reblogged with MessageDance using Google Reader

Freddie "absolutely" has enough capital: spokeswoman

Poor spokeswoman! She is just reciting from the script.


Freddie "absolutely" has enough capital: spokeswoman
Reuters - 1 hour ago
NEW YORK ( Reuters ) - Freddie Mac , the second - largest source of US home funding , " absolutely " has enough capital , a spokeswoman told Reuters on Thursday.The company is also committed ...
Freddie Mac leads financial-services stocks lower - MarketWatch
UBS Cuts Freddie Mac Price Target to $10 as Credit Losses Grow - Bloomberg



Reblogged with MessageDance using Google Reader

Lehman Shares Sink as Fannie, Freddie Plunge Further (Update1)

This stinks..


Lehman Shares Sink as Fannie, Freddie Plunge Further (Update1)
Bloomberg - 33 minutes ago
July 10 ( Bloomberg ) - - Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc . , once the largest US underwriter of mortgage - backed bonds , fell to an eight - year low in New York trading as home - loan financing ...



Reblogged with MessageDance using Google Reader

Tuesday, June 24, 2008

Real Estate Commonsense RIP 2002

Moreover, the authors suggest that homeownership is not always an effective way to accumulate wealth, and they blame economists and policy professionals for not recognizing the housing bubble that they claim could be seen as far back as 2002.
"Unfortunately, we had this huge cohort of baby boomers and they really weren't paying attention," Baker said. "People who should have been saving for their own retirement weren't."

Drama unfolds..

whatever in thousand cuts..




Blogged with MessageDance using Gmail

Wednesday, June 18, 2008

Death of American suburban dream. Bill Bonner a**hole is laughing his way to bank

What goes around, comes around...

Every country in the world has had to put up with finger wagging and scolding from U.S. officials. The U.S. economy was the world's best for so many years – and American experts, government officials, professors and consultants never got tired of saying so.
But now...as the Rolling Stones put it... "Tables turn and now her turn to cry." Now, the tears are coming from the United States; the foreigners are doing the scolding.
Bloomberg reports that U.S. housing starts are at their lowest level in 17 years. Housing prices are going down too, while consumer prices go up – both apparently at a faster and faster rate.

Producer prices in the United States rose 1.4% last month, following an increase of 0.2% the month before...annualizing the two months gives us a rate just shy of 10%.
Meanwhile, prices paid by producers were 7.2% higher than a year ago.
Worldwide inflation is about 7%, says Bill Gross of PIMCO. And since price inflation has now been globalized, there is no escaping. Here in Britain, consumer price inflation, officially, is running at its highest rate in 10 years.

"There is really nothing we can do about it," said an analyst at this morning's investment meeting. "We're a small island. We have to import things from overseas. Prices are rising everywhere. How can they not rise here? We're just at the beginning of this trend. It's going to get worse."
It is going to get worse everywhere. Inflation is in the pipes. Soon, it will be backing up in the bathtub drain and spilling over from the sink. Over the last 15 years, the world has seen huge inputs of 'liquidity' – cash and credit from central banks and the financial industry. Everyone was perfectly happy when this juice was going into asset prices. But one by one the bubbles have popped...and now the liquidity goes where it is unwelcome – into commodities, food, and fuel.
Consumers and central banks are both trapped. Central banks want to lower rates and increase liquidity in order to stimulate a sagging economy. But their inflation no longer swells assets prices and nourishes economic growth; now it leaks into consumer prices.

And the poor American consumer...he spent his entire career preparing for an economy that no longer exists. He has a big house...a big car...and, often, a big mortgage. America's far-flung suburbs were invented when gasoline was only about 25 cents a gallon and real U.S. incomes were rising. We remember it well. We'd drive into a gas station and tell the pump monkey: "Let me have $2 worth." Heck, 2 bucks' worth was all you needed. You got eight gallons – enough to last you all week. Now, gasoline is $4 a gallon...and real incomes are scarcely higher than they were in the late '60s. And now the typical commuter lives too far out in the suburbs to walk to work. And even if he could, this item from the
 
 
Wall Street Journal offers little comfort:

"Pain at the Other Pump: Shoe Prices Rise." The story tells us that footwear is going up too – about 10% to 15% next year, which "would be the largest single-year increase in more than 50 years."
And the poor man didn't bother to save money, because he didn't need to. His house rose in price...and there was always someone ready to lend him money when he needed it. But now...the cost of credit is going up too.
What we are looking at is big. It's an historic turnaround. In financial terms, it is the end of the era of cheap credit. In cultural terms, it's the end of the prosperous, suburban U.S.A. as we have known it...the U.S.A. that we grew up in.

The last credit expansion began, by the way, with the Reagan Revolution, in the very early '80s, with bond yields over 15%. It ended either in 2003 or 2005 or a couple weeks ago. Yields on the 10-year Treasury note fell below 4% on several occasions. But now they are rising. Investors fear rising inflation. Even at current rates, they still buy treasuries at yields below the rate of consumer price inflation. But they'll regret it, in our opinion. The trend seems to be up. It is the beginning of what probably will be a long period of higher inflation rates...higher bond yields...and tighter credit generally.

So too have we entered into a period of higher energy costs. The price of oil hit a new intraday high yesterday at nearly $140. It will probably drop back below $100...but the days of $10...$20...or even $50 oil are probably gone forever.

And the suburbs? Are they dead too? We don't know...but
hope so; we never liked them.

All this is bad news for people who organized their lives on cheap oil and cheap credit – especially those for whom it is too late to make big changes.
USA Today reports, for example, that the rate of bankruptcy is skyrocketing among old people. From 1991 to 2007, the rate went up 150%. But for those 75 to 84, the rate has exploded 433%.

The poor codgers. It's bad enough being old. Imagine being broke too.
*** A few weeks ago, the Indians were giving America a piece of their mind. This week, it's the Chinese. The subprime crisis was caused by Washington's "warped conception" of market regulation, said a Chinese banking regulator... and the Chinese media has gone so far as to compare China's decisive action in Sichuan Province after the earthquake to the Bush administration's diddling after Hurricane Katrina.

"U.S. credibility and the credibility of U.S. financial markets is zero everywhere in the world," says Joseph E. Stiglitz, a professor of economics at Columbia University.
"Anybody looking at this from the outside says, 'There's been a lot of hot air coming out of the U.S., so why should we listen to these guys when they didn't know how to manage risk?'"

The Chinese yuan has gone up 11% against the dollar so far this year.
*** When it rains, it pours. The Midwest has seen the worst flooding in 15 years...pushing up grain prices even higher.
But it could be worse. You could be in Argentina, from which our colleague Paola Pecora reports on the latest conditions (farmers are blocking roads to protest tax increases):


Blogged with MessageDance using Gmail

Monday, June 2, 2008

Housing sector sucks but that cannot stop creativity. Buy one and get one for free.

In Escondido: Buy one (house), get one free.

Bogof_flyer1In a sign of how difficult it is to sell new homes in Southern California right now, a San Diego developer is offering a "buy one, get one free" deal, pairing million-dollar homes with less expensive homes.

"We thought, 'Why does it just have to be on Pop Tarts and restaurants? Why not buy one home, get one free,'" Dawn Berry of Michael Crews Development told 10 News in San Diego.

More: "Michael Crews Development is offering new, 2000-square foot cityscape row-homes worth $400,000 in Escondido for free -- if you buy one Royal View Estate home in San Pasqual Valley starting at $1.6 million.  'You know it's a straight-up legit deal; no prices have been increased, there are no hidden costs. Michael is just giving away a free home for people that buy at Royal View,' said Berry."

"Adam Rossman of Michael Crews Development added, 'People have been coming in saying, 'How can you do this?' Well, it's our way of dealing with current market conditions to move some inventory.' "









Blogged with MessageDance using Gmail

Thursday, May 29, 2008

Bill Bonner on Supply and Demand

As Simple as Supply and Demand? 

*** The vigilantes are back...putting the screws to the consumers...the confusing Big Picture in the oil market...

*** Could the key to understanding the oil market be as simple as grasping the theory of supply and demand?

*** The latest news for U.S. housing is worse than ever...Byron King recreates the infamous meeting at Bretton Woods in 1944...and more!

Oh la la, dear reader...the vigilantes are back!

Those happy trends of the Great Moderation period – roughly, the 15 years before 2007 – have turned for the worse.

Globalization, for example, helped keep prices down in the United States. Americans could reach for all the imports they wanted without getting rapped on the knuckles by the usual consumer price inflation. That is, like a drunk who never gets a hangover, they could enjoy an inflationary boom without ever having to pay higher consumer prices.

Now, the screw has turned a full 180 degrees...now they can cut back...spend less...and still have to pay higher prices! The world was such a benign, forgiving place before 2007. Now it has turned wicked.

Let's begin our exploration of this nasty turn of events by looking at the oil market.

We are out of oil; at $130, we regard it as too speculative. But that doesn't mean that the oil bubble is going to burst anytime soon...or that the real price of oil won't be even higher 10 years from now than it is today.

The Big Picture in the oil market is one of the most confusing and complex we have ever seen. It is like a painting by Hieronymus Bosch, where there is so much going on you can't quite tell what it all means.

On the one hand, there is the background of supply and demand. Even here, the picture is not a clear one. Oil supplies seem to be running out. Of the world's 60 top oil producers, 54 report declining output. Indonesia announced yesterday that its production had slipped so much, it was no longer an exporter; the country had to withdraw from OPEC, since it has become an oil importer.

On the other hand, Brazil has recently reported huge new finds. New technologies offer ways to get more oil out of existing fields. And more and more alternatives to petroleum are being developed. Brazil is also the world's leading producer of biofuels, mostly from sugar cane, and is ramping up production as fast as it can. Solar power is hot.

As for oil itself, there is only so much available...and many experts believe the maximum annual extraction level – Peak Oil – is coming up soon. From that point onward, the world will just have to make do with tighter supplies and higher prices.

Looking at the demand side, we see the opposite picture – a curve rising from here to eternity. A few years ago, millions...maybe billions...of the world's people lived almost without fossil fuel of any sort. They tilled rice paddies, for example, with water buffalo, cooked their meals on a wood fire, and traveled on bicycles. Now they're moving to the city, living in apartments heated by oil, eating commercial food grown with plenty of petroleum-based inputs, working in heated, energy-absorbing factories, riding on automobiles and buses, and buying things that take energy to make and energy (usually oil) to deliver.

It used to be a sure thing that if the United States had a recession, oil consumption – and energy prices – would go down. But in the last year, oil consumption in the United States has gone down 1.3% – even as the price of it soared. How is that possible? It is partly explained by that giant sucking sound coming from the emerging markets, the BRICs (Brazil, Russia, India and China) and the Middle East. These countries are all using a lot more energy – partly because they are getting a lot richer, and partly because they tend to keep internal energy prices low (which helps explain why they are growing so fast). Both China and India have refused to allow their large oil companies to raise domestic prices in line with world market prices, encouraging greater consumption. In the BRIC nations, oil use went up 4% during the last 12 months.

But how come investors didn't see it coming? A man of 30 may be unprepared to die in a train wreck; but a man of 90 typically has a Last Will & Testament. These trends in demand and supply are well known...and they happen slowly. How could investors miss them? How come the price of oil stayed so low for so long? How come it more than doubled since the beginning of '07...and went up more in the last 6 months than the entire oil price prior to 2005?

*** Let's look again at this remarkable tableau of the oil market. In addition to the supply and demand pictures, there is a lot more going on. Over on the side are the central bankers – led by Ben Bernanke and the U.S. Fed. What are they doing? Let us look hard...oh yes, they seem to be printing money! Yes, the Fed – the guardian of America's financial integrity – is lending money at 2% below the official inflation rate (probably more like 6% below the real inflation rate). And it is permitting the supply of money to increase at an estimated 16% annual rate. Remember, when the supply of money increases faster than the supply of goods and services (GDP), prices rise. With GDP flat or barely rising at all, a 16% increase in money supply represents a huge inflationary push.

And look! Prices are rising, just as they should. Want proof? Just drive to a filling station...or go to the grocery store. As reported in this space, the ingredients for a typical Memorial Day cookout rose by double digits in the last 12 months.

And look at this. Over on the other side...what's this? A group of vigilantes!

Yes, dear reader, they're back...the vigilantes...ready to mount up and ride out whenever they think the Fed is being too inflationary. Back in the '70s and '80s the vigilantes won their spurs in the bond market. As soon as they saw the money supply figures creeping up on them, the vigilantes strapped on their guns and shot the bond market to pieces. Bond prices fell...forcing up yields....and thereby forcing the authorities to back off. It was bond market vigilantes who convinced the feds that the jig was up in the late '70s. They still had the power to inflate the money supply as they had during the '60s. But they couldn't get away with it anymore. When the vigilantes dumped bonds and drove up interest rates, the economy went into such a slump, it just wasn't worth it.

We'd been wondering what happened to the vigilantes. The feds have been increasing the money supply twice, three times...and now infinitely...faster than GDP growth. How come the vigilantes let them get away with it? How come the bond market didn't crash? Why did they still buy bonds...didn't they know they were going to lose money?

We still don't know the answer. Maybe the vigilantes have grown old and too tired to strap on their six-shooters... maybe they've gotten Alzheimers and no longer know how things work.

But lo and behold...here they are again – in the oil market! They've found a new way to bring some financial discipline and monetary rectitude to the feds.

The sharp upward move in oil began at just about the same time the Fed began printing more currency, bailing out investment firms, and cutting its key rate. The supply and demand situation hadn't changed; but the monetary situation had – and the vigilantes saw it. Rather than sell bonds...they bought oil!

Higher oil prices, of course, depress economic activity. They, along with falling house prices, are the two things pushing the United States into a slump. Usually, a slowdown would bring pain...but some relief too. Prices, notably the price of oil, would fall. But now globalization – which had been such a delight during all those years of the Great Moderation – kicks us in the derriere. Americans are forced to cut back on energy use. But the foreigners take up the slack...and then some. The oil price refuses to fall.

And the feds try to make up for it by cutting rates and increasing the money supply. They're desperate to try to get the party going again. But then along come the crude oil vigilantes. In just seconds, they've pulled the plug on the amplifier and turned off the beer machine. Oil goes higher, and the economy sinks further.

*** The latest news from the U.S. housing market is bad. New house sales are still near their lowest level in 17 years. And the New York Times reports that even the best markets – like Seattle – are beginning to sink. The Times mentions a guess that prices could fall another 10% before stabilizing.

*** Rising consumer prices, combined with stagnant incomes and falling house prices, has the U.S. public in a squeeze. The "middle class is struggling to stay in the same place," says a report on CNNMoney.

This has to result in lower consumer spending – and an economic slump in the United States. We got evidence of sharply lower spending in yesterday's driving figures.

Now, we're going to see it in other areas. Yesterday, for example, Dow Chemical announced price hikes of 20%  which will feed into a whole range of consumer goods, from diapers to detergent.

*** The BRIC nations held an historic meeting in Yekaterinburg, Russia, last week. They're growing very fast...with rising markets, rising incomes, rising currencies, and rising GDPs. Together, their percentage of total global growth grew 50% between 2000 and 2008.

The BRIC meeting seems intended to remind us that it is a big world...with a lot more going on it than we realize. Economies rise and fall. Nations and empires too. And here is colleague Byron King's explanation of how the U.S. dollar came to be the world's reserve currency. (It helps us look ahead...to when the U.S. dollar will no longer be the world's reserve currency.)

"I have long tried to imagine the discussion at Bretton Woods in July 1944. US, British & Canadian troops had just landed in France. Germany was bleeding white on the Russian Front. The Japanese Empire was dying in the Pacific. Everyone knew that there was hard fighting ahead. But everyone also knew that the Axis was going to be defeated, and the Allied nations would win the war.

"So 730 delegates from 44 Allied nations gathered in New Hampshire to chart the future course of the world monetary system.

"There are, of course, reports and summaries of what people said for the record. But what did the US delegates REALLY say at Bretton Woods? Let's just imagine...

"'OK, everyone. Nice to see you all. Hey, did you see the invasion force at Normandy last month? Can you do that? No? Oh. Well, we did that. And we can do it again.'

"'How about that industrial base back home, eh? Those Rosie the Riveter girls sure can knock out the old landing craft. How's your industrial base? Oh. Well, that's OK.

"'And it's a good thing we had all those bombers in the 8th Air Force in England, huh? Yep. Those bombers just turn the sky black, don't they? And how about that steel rain when the bombs come whistling down? You want area bombing? We have area bombing. On a good day, we can do precision bombing too. Can you do precision bombing? No? Oh.'

"'And we have 200 submarines in the Pacific. Do you have 200 submarines? No? Oh, gee.'

"'Overall, we have a 2,000 ship navy, with over 100 aircraft carriers. Do you have a 2,000-ship navy, with over 100 aircraft carriers? No? Oh. That's OK. Not everyone can have a 2,000-ship navy. Or 100 aircraft carriers.'

"'And have you heard about the B-29? It's an intercontinental bomber. Yep. Takes off from the U.S., and bombs another continent. We're going to build a lot of those B-29s. Do you have B-29s? No? Oh.'

"'And I can't get into details, but the U.S. has this really big program to develop the next generation of weapons. It's all classified, so I can't talk about it. But we have all the best physicists and chemists and mathematicians working on it. Really, there are so many brilliant minds working on it that you just can't find a decent physicist or chemist or mathematician any more. Do you have one of those programs? No? Oh.'

"'And how about all that gold in the U.S. government vaults? Back in 1933, President Roosevelt collected all the gold from every person in the United States. All of it. The whole national treasure. It's all under our control now. The Supreme Court said it was OK, so it's even legal. Now we have just thousands of tons of gold. Do you have thousands of tons of gold? No? Oh.'

"'OK everyone, let's get down to work. I propose that we make the U.S. dollar the world's reserve currency. Any questions? No? Oh.'"

Until tomorrow,

Bill Bonner
The Daily Reckoning



Blogged with MessageDance using Gmail

Tuesday, May 27, 2008

Bill Bonner is waiting for Final Bubble. This guy knows his stuff!

Awaiting the Final Bubble
London, England
Tuesday, May 27, 2008

---------------------

*** Why an 8th rate cut won't matter...remembering on the Great Moderation...

*** A recession by the numbers...two things you don't dare criticize...

*** Guilty by association and dropped under the campaign bus...a modern way to feel like a 16th-century heretic...and more!


Yesterday, markets were closed in both the United States and Britain. Still, here at The Daily Reckoning 's mobile command post, we continued our lonely vigil. What are we waiting for? What are we watching for?

Ah, dear reader...just a little dignity, a little grace, a little courage and beauty. That's all we ask. Can we find it on Wall Street? In Washington? In politics or economics? We hope so, because that's all we have to work with here at The Daily Reckoning .

Oil went up yesterday. Asian markets fell – with Japan taking its biggest hit in six weeks. And the dollar fell. Speculators are beginning to bet that the Fed will cut rates for an 8th time; that's the world on the street. As we predicted, the first 7 cuts have done wonders for the prices of oil, gold and commodities...but little for the real economy. Oil has gone up 60% in six months...putting big pressure on U.S. household budgets. Now, instead of taking the hint – that it's time to go in the other direction, by raising rates to head off rising prices – speculators think Ben Bernanke will continue battling deflation with further rate cuts. Maybe, maybe not...but our guess is that it doesn't matter. Even if the Fed raises rates, it is unlikely to raise them enough to block the consumer price inflation already in the pipeline.

In economic theory, the supply of money is the key to prices. Prices should remain more or less stable when the supply of money increases at the same rate as the supply of goods and services. But in the last 15 years, the U.S. money supply increased about twice as fast as GDP. The surprising thing was that prices didn't rise. That was the period known as the Great Moderation. As reported here yesterday, food prices only increased at a 2.5% annual rate...even though money supply, MZM, was going up at nearly 9%.

We have given our opinion as to why consumer prices did not go up. We guessed, too, that those trends that labored so hard to hold them down have now walked off the job. Prices now seem to be adjusting to a higher money supply, with food up 4% last year, officially. Unofficially and anecdotally, consumer prices are rising at about 10% per year.

But while consumer prices were stable during that 15-year period...asset prices frequently went into bubble territory. And now, we await the Final Bubble, dear reader...about which we will have more to say later in the week.

In the meantime, the winner of the Enron Prize, and former headman at the Fed, Alan Greenspan, is in the news this morning. The Financial Times reports that he believes "there still greater than 50% probability of recession."

Warren Buffett, on the other hand, says recession is already a fact of life. And he says it will be "deeper and longer that people expect."

The old timer's definition of a recession was 'when your neighbor loses his job.' When you lose your own job, it's a depression. How many people have lost their jobs in this downturn? Well, for the answer to that question we look to the same people who give us the official inflation numbers – the apparatchiks at the U.S. Labor Department. Therein, of course, hangs a tale...and we will let Dana Samuelson of Danagold tell it:

"The average person judges a recession mainly on employment. If jobs are available, then the economy is holding up. If jobs are scarce, the economy is poor. By that standard, the economy is really struggling, with payrolls down in each of the first four months of the year. But the headline figures, again, don't reflect the lived reality of Americans. At 5.0% in April, down from 5.1% in March, the current BLS unemployment rate is relatively low by historical standards. Yet the number of jobless Americans of prime working age, that is, men aged 24 to 54, is historically high at 13.1%. Most of these people don't qualify as unemployed but they are nonetheless out of work.

"Why don't these would-be workers show up in the headline statistics? Mainly because the government's definition of the unemployed includes only people who do not have a job, have actively looked for work in the four weeks preceding the survey, and are currently available for work. But it excludes the self-employed, 1099 workers who can't get enough contracts, those working part-time or on commission only, and the under-employed (like real estate agents waiting tables or mortgage brokers bagging groceries). It also doesn't count those who've given up looking for work altogether – a category known as 'discouraged workers,' defined as persons not currently looking for work specifically because they believe there aren't any jobs available for them. Some analysts say this particular group of jobless Americans – who believe their prospects for finding a job are getting ever dimmer, yet who don't figure in the computation of the unemployment rate – represent the nation's dire job situation. According to John Williams' Shadow Government Statistics, the primary source for unbiased economic data, if adjusted for 'discouraged workers,' the actual unemployment figure for April rose to 13.1%, up from 13.0% in March. Now that's recessionary!"

Real inflation at 10%? Real unemployment at 13%? Maybe. But we have not quite seen the fall off in consumer spending that these numbers suggest...

...stay tuned.

*** Since we have so little market news to report to you, we will take our quest for truth and beauty to other areas: global warming and the children of Israel for example. Both are touchy issues. In Europe, if you say you are skeptical of global warming, they look at you like a lion at a Christian. In America, you can say almost any nasty thing you want against Arabs...but if you are planning to run for public office, don't dare to criticize Israel.

We begin by telling a story that a Jewish colleague told us yesterday.

"You really have to be careful to maintain good relations with your neighbors. That's something my family discovered in WWII. My father was just a little boy in Paris when the war broke out...and then the French surrendered. You know, France was divided in two...there was the zone occupied by the Nazis and there was the unoccupied zone to the South. Since they were Jewish, they figured they'd sneak across the line and once they got to the unoccupied zone, they would just keep a low profile, not mention to anyone that they were Jews, and they would be safe. But my father was only a kid. And when they put him in the local school, in the little town they were staying in, the first thing he did was tell everyone that he was a Jew. So everyone knew why they were there. And then, when the Germans took over all of France anyone in the village could have denounced them and get them sent to a concentration camp. But no one did."

This recalled another story. A disagreeable French woman, then in her '70s, once told us that during the war she had been the directress of a boarding school for little children. It was a Catholic boarding school. But it was wartime and a few of the children were Jewish, sent there by their parents in the hopes that they would be safe.

"When the Germans came to Lyon, they came around to the school. They demanded that we send out the Jewish children. The truth is, I don't like Jews. But I disliked the Nazis even more. I had already changed the school's records so the Jewish names didn't show up anywhere. So, I told the lieutenant that we only had Catholic children. And I showed him the list. If he had wanted to pursue the matter, he probably would have found the Jewish kids and then sent them and me to the camps. But maybe he didn't really want to find them...you never knew; it was a strange time."

Well, times are always strange, we guess. And we find our little bits of courage and grace here and there...in odd places...and generally in the shadows. In the harsh light of the public eye, these civilized little acts of kindness and courage wilt like wildflowers...or get run over by a campaign bus.

When a presidential candidate discovers that a former friend or supporter has become a liability, for example, he is "thrown under the bus." Jeremiah Wright has the tire tracks to prove it – since he was thrown under the bus of the Obama campaign. The Obama group also sacrificed Robert Malley, an advisor on the Middle East, after it was revealed that he had met with Hamas officials. As every American knows, the Hamas fellows are bad hombres, and anyone who meets with them is no friend of Israel. Since being a friend of Israel, like wearing a flag on the lapel, is a requirement for America's top office, Obama had to push Malley off the team and then run him over with the bus.

Zbigniew Brzezinski, former national security advisor, said he thought the Jewish lobby has become too powerful and is showing a "McCarthyite tendency...by slandering, vilifying, demonizing. They very promptly wheel out anti-Semitism..."

So far, Mr. Brzezinski hasn't been dropped under the bus, but he should probably check his ticket.

Over on the McCain bus, another man of faith has been tossed beneath the treads. The Rev. John Hagee has views worthy of a man with great faith. According to Gideon Rachman's Blog in the FT , he believes the European Union is headed by the Antichrist. In his mind, the EU is a prelude to Apocalypse. And who are we to say he is wrong? There's no mention of it in the EU charter, but who knows what they're up to?

If Mr. Hagee had stopped there, he probably would have been all right, since most Americans agree that there is something ungodly about Europe. But then he goes further...and says that the Jews were murdered in WWII for a good reason – to drive them to Israel. It's all part of God's plan, he says; God made Hitler so the Jews would move to Israel, so the Apocalypse would come, followed by the second coming. How he knows God's plans in such detail, we can't imagine, but that's the beauty of faith; you can believe anything you want...until you put it to the test.

Rev. Hagee is a McCain supporter. But McCain is no longer a Hagee supporter; the reverend had to go "under the bus."

Under the bus, too, is where skepticism regarding global warming is going. George W. Bush fairly recently got on board, agreeing that the earth's climate is changing and the humans are to blame for it. And now all three candidates not only favor doing something about it – all endorse the idea of "cap and trade" as a palliative measure.

Here too, faith conquers wit. No one really knows what direction the earth's mean temperature is going...or why. There are only hypotheses.

"But if you really want to know what it's like to be a 16th-century heretic, try saying you're a bit skeptical about man-made global warming," writes Harry Mount in the Daily Telegraph .

In the middle ages, the Catholic Church made money by offering sinners a way to buy their way out of Hell – with an indulgence. In today's secular world, you will have to buy your way out of the sin of using too much fossil fuel, by buying "carbon rights."

Until tomorrow,

Bill Bonner
The Daily Reckoning

--- Special Offer ---

Options Made Easy

Some investors shy away from playing options. And that's understandable. There's often a lot of risk involved. Well, not any more...

In this new report, you'll discover a little-known way to play options with significantly less risk, and even less work. Click here for more information .


The Daily Reckoning PRESENTS: The following story, first published in the Rude Awakening , tells a cyclical tale. I liked the story so much that I'm including it here in case you missed it. I'm not recommending the idea – not because I don't like it, but because I'm finding bigger upsides elsewhere for us right now. But it's one to keep an eye on...

ACID ROCKS
by Chris Mayer

Interesting how certain threads come together... I read recently that copper producers are complaining about the skyrocketing costs of sulfuric acid. A few days later, I read about Mosaic, a fertilizer company – about how the rising cost of sulfuric acid could impact its profit margins. Then last week, I came across a piece about how the cost of treating water is "going through the roof." The main culprit is, once again, the rising price of sulfuric acid.

As one water utility rep said: "As sulfuric acid prices increase, so do the products that contain this ingredient. The U.S. has also seen a shortage in supply of sulfuric acid. The U.S. has imported the majority of sulfuric acid from China in the past, but recently, China has slowed the trade of sulfuric acid to the U.S. because its own demand is greater than what China can produce for both the U.S. and itself." In short, demand is swamping supply. Sulfuric acid prices in March hit a record high of $329 per ton, according to Purchasingdata.com, after trading at $90 per ton as recently as October. Sulfuric acid shortages?

Hmmm... Well, time to take a look at this, think I.

"Sulfuric acid is one of those unheralded lubricants that keep the gears of the industrial economy spinning," says Chemical and Engineering News. "Although less in the limelight than petrochemicals such as ethylene or polyethylene, it is, in fact, the largest-volume chemical in the world."

We use sulfuric acid in mining to extract copper, nickel and uranium. We use it in steel production and in making fertilizers. We use it to refine oil and to treat wastewater. It goes into the plastics we make, and a bunch of other things. The biofuel boom has kicked off a big increase in the demand for sulfuric acid. In fact, some 60% of the sulfuric acid ends up in agriculture. The surge in ethanol production is a doublewhammy on sulfuric acid. First, all that corn needs fertilizers. And second, the ethanol facilities themselves also use sulfuric acid in their own processing. A typical ethanol facility requires 2,000 4,000 tons of sulfuric acid per year.

Then there is that great demand pull from China and India. Traditionally, these two countries produced what they needed. But now their own rapid industrialization has turned the tables. They've switched from being exporters to importers of sulfuric acid.

The boom in metals such as copper and nickel also drives the demand for sulfuric acid. Smelting operations typically throw off sulfuric acid as a byproduct. But even here, metals companies need more than they can produce.

Supply is also tight. As with many commodities, there was a long period when sulfuric acid prices went nowhere. This led to a decrease in production facilities. I found one example of a closure as late as November 2006, when GenTek shut down a sulfuric acid facility due to "adverse market conditions."

There also seems to be little new capacity on tap. Industrial Info Resources, in Sugar Land, Texas, tracks this sort of thing. According to IIR, of the $89 million invested in sulfuric projects in the U.S. in 2007, most of the funds went toward planned maintenance, rather than expanded capacity. It also turns out that not only is supply tight, but there are all kinds of transportation bottlenecks in delivery – such as a shortage of rail cars. Key Compton, president of a sulfuric acid producer in Texas, said toward the end of last year that customers soon "may be paying prices for sulfuric acid that they've never seen before."

So how can you play it? Well, there are a number of producers of sulfuric acid. Most are big chemical companies that you wouldn't own because you want exposure to sulfuric acid. Owning them is like buying Home Depot because you think it sells a great lawn mower. The only "pure play" on the idea I could find is a little company called Chemtrade Logistics in Canada, one of the world's largest suppliers of sulfuric acid. It trades in Toronto under the ticker symbol CHE. You can find a quote on Yahoo using CHE-UN.TO.

It's a Canadian income trust and pays a monthly distribution of about 10 cents. Based on a price of $11.44, that's a yield of 10.5%. The company appears to be in good financial condition and throws off a lot of cash flow, much of which investors pocket in the distribution. It's not a sexy business, but it looks like an interesting play on what seems to be at least a temporary scarcity of a key chemical. Chemtrade is not a one-trick pony. It also produces liquid sulfur dioxide and sodium hydrosulfite. The company also sells into a wide range of end markets, so you're not tied to the fortunes of any single sector. The company has an excellent presentation of its business, complete with slides, on its Web site.

Since I have not completed my research on either Chemtrade or the overall sulfuric acid industry, I do not recommend Chemtrade. But since this sector is red-hot at the moment and appealing on many levels, I decided to share the insights I've gleaned so far. I plan to do more research on the idea. I would advise all investors do the same.

Regards,

Chris Mayer
for The Daily Reckoning

P.S. The skyrocketing price of sulfuric acid shows how interrelated the world's commodity markets and economies have become. And these interrelationships can produce investment opportunities at light speed. Agriculture, energy, metals... they're all part of one big story – one big, rapidly evolving story. And even though this pick isn't quite ready to recommend, there are some investments I've been tracking that you might want to take a look at. Read more here...

Editor's Note: Chris is a veteran of the banking industry, specifically in the area of corporate lending. A financial writer since 1998, Mr. Mayer's essays have appeared in a wide variety of publications, from the Mises.org Daily Article series to here in The Daily Reckoning . He is the editor of Mayer's Special Situations and Capital & Crisis – formerly the Fleet Street Letter .

Chris also recently wrote a book: Invest Like a Dealmaker: Secrets from a Former Banking Insider . Get your copy now... 


A Golden Answer : Protection Against Untrustworthy Paper Currencies

The Key to the Commodity Boom : Investing in Commodities

Not Ethanol it's Cracked Up to Be : The Truth About this 'Alternative' Fuel 

Discover How You Can Rake In Enormous Profits from the "Most Aggressive Wealth Creation In History" --
With Just this $17 Stock!

Click to Learn More About Mobs, Messiah's and Markets.




Blogged with MessageDance using Gmail

Saturday, May 24, 2008

I’m back from vacation, some links I’m reading

Worse is yet to come

via I Will Teach You To Be Rich by Ramit Sethi on 3/25/08

I’m back from India!

I had a great time in Delhi and Mumbai, and I’ll probably post some of my photos/thoughts a little later. I was also lucky enough to meet up with a few readers (here’s Ranjan’s writeup on meeting me), so thank you to everyone who met up and said hello.

While I’m catching up on stuff, here are some links that caught my attention recently.




Reblogged with MessageDance using Google Reader

End to credit crisis is just an American pipedream

End to credit crisis is just an American pipedream


THOSE in the US who have begun predicting the end of the credit crisis ought to have tuned in to National Public Radio last week when they would have heard what the housing crisis means for ordinary Americans.


Stories of families moving back to Mom and Dad's after struggling to either buy a home or keep the one they already had rammed home the message that this is a problem likely to run and run.

At the beginning of the week, it was easy to write these people off as a tail-end minority emerging from the trough of the worst US housing slump in more than two decades. However, opinion has shifted significantly as signs of a continuing decline in house prices and a build up of inflationary pressures have caused Wall Street to worry about consumers' ability to spend the US out of economic slowdown.

"I don't think anybody is fooling themselves that it is going to be easy from here on out," says Paul Ashworth, senior US economist with Capital Economics in Toronto. "House prices are plummeting, confidence is plummeting, and inflation is very much on the rise."

Indeed, the cost of oil and food, not to mention other products, has made investors quite jittery. Although oil prices eased back from an all-time peak of more than $135 per barrel, no one expects any serious relief in the near future.

Even before oil touched these record-breaking levels, the cost of gas had been grabbing headlines for months in the auto-addicted United States. E-mails on how to get best value at the pump – "fill up your tank when the temperature is cooler" – have been zipping their way across the internet for months.

In response, the US House of Representatives overwhelmingly passed legislation last week that would allow member states of Opec to be sued in US courts for limiting oil supplies and colluding to fix prices.

The Gas Relief for Consumers Act is not expected to make it into law, as it must still be approved by the US Senate and President Bush, the latter of whom has already threatened a veto on the basis that such lawsuits would be counter-productive to overall trade. However, this political gesture in an election year should play well with voters who are increasingly short of cash despite the return of tax dollars by the federal government in the coming weeks.

"Obviously we have got the tax rebates coming, so that should be some help (towards boosting consumer spending], but of course a lot of that will be swallowed up by filling up at the pump," says Ashworth.

Meanwhile, US homeowners can only sit and watch as the value of their properties continues to drop. On Thursday, a key government index showed that home prices fell at a record pace in the first three months of 2008, resulting in a year-long decline in house prices.

The house price index produced by the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (OFHEO) recorded a 1.7% drop between January and March, the largest quarterly decline since the index began in 1991.

The index is down 3.1% during the last four quarters, the largest decline over that period in the history of the index.

The unease caused by these continuing declines has cut into the profits of nearly every major quoted firm reliant upon the US housing market, as homeowners cut back on everything from major maintenance to the purchase of new fixtures and fittings. Most recently, DIY chains Lowe's and Home Depot fell victim to the spending crunch, while hundreds of thousands of smaller firms are feeling the pinch as well.

Adding to the gloom is the increasingly unlikely prospect that US interest rate authorities will further cut the cost of borrowing. Having slashed rates by 3.25 percentage points since mid-September, the US Federal Reserve has little room left to cut from the current 2% benchmark, particularly against a backdrop of surging prices for energy and commodities. Despite the simple arithmetic weighing against a further cut, some analysts still believe monetary authorities will be forced into further bold moves. The pressure was not eased when a top official from the International Monetary Fund warned on Tuesday that the global economy remained threatened by both financial instability and the spread of slowing US economic growth to the rest of the world.

"We still see serious risks to global financial stability," said John Lipsky, first deputy managing director of the IMF.

"Policy-makers need to avoid complacency and take steps to restore confidence."

Lipsky, whose remarks were made in Tokyo, added that "perhaps extraordinary" measures would be needed if the US economy did not recover from its current malaise later this year.

"Persistently weak US growth would significantly inhibit a return to trend growth in other advanced economies, and could undermine growth in emerging economies as well," he said. Just a day after his comments, the IMF confirmed it was cutting its global growth forecast for 2008 to 3.7%, down from 4.1% previously.

At the heart of Wall Street, the consumer crunch is also making waves. Infamous banking analyst Meredith Whitney – who shot to notoriety when she predicted troubles at Citigroup last autumn – has now weighed in with her opinion that the major US banks will need to take an extra $170bn of write-downs by the end of next year.

The notoriously bearish Whitney cited the collapse of the securitisation business and a "sharp" pullback in consumer spending as the main reasons for this prediction.

There are few among the ranks of analysts who count Whitney as a friend, but there are also few who now disagree that economic recovery will be a long slog, rather than a quick rebound.

"There is no magical cure here," said Capital Economics' Ashworth. "Consumers are just facing a lot of headwinds now."

------------------------------------

Bought but can't hold

Commentary: Put your house on the market now? Are you nuts?

CHICAGO (MarketWatch) -- Either American home sellers are an incredibly optimistic lot, or they think they are stock traders who need to dump their assets in a declining market. How else to explain the surge in homes going up for sale in April, in the teeth of the worst downturn in housing since the Great Depression?
Because home buyers are spooked by the current environment, in which home prices have been falling in many markets across the country, there has been a glut of unsold homes on the market for more than a year. Sellers have been cutting their prices to attract the limited buyers out there -- the median price of a home sold in the U.S. in April was off 8% from a year earlier -- but that has done little to cut into the inventory. See full story.
Against that backdrop, sellers still concluded April was the time to move. The inventory of unsold homes on the market jumped 10.5% in April to 4.55 million units. At the current sales pace, that represents an 11.2-month supply of houses -- nearly double what the real estate industry considers to be a health level.
Of course, April is the biggest time of the year for putting houses on the market. That's because of the school-year cycle; families with kids in school who need to move in the June-August summer recess have to get their homes on the market then in order to sell, buy and close on both transactions before the fall term begins.
But even by seasonal standards the number of houses put on the market last month was high. And here is why that is particularly ominous:
  • Many of those potential sales are likely forced. Strapped homeowners who are struggling to keep up with mortgage payments may feel compelled to sell and get what they can for their house before the financial burden overwhelms them.
  • Many of those houses are foreclosures. With foreclosure proceedings nearly double what they were a year ago, banks are being handed the keys to record number of properties. Their aim is to get rid of them, regardless of market conditions.
  • Many of these moves are not discretionary. Let's face it: The job market is not the most stable right now. Folks who face layoffs or are "asked" to transfer may have little choice but to put their home on the market.
  • Many of these properties are failed investments. The speculators who bought -- mostly condos -- in the boom times in anticipation of quick profit have been caught with their windows down. They may have been tempted to hold for a rebound, but like stock traders they will also cut and run with no bottom in sight.
Some of the folks who put their houses on the market in April may end up pulling them off the market in subsequent months, once they see how choppy the water really is. But for most, it's now sink or swim.

--------------------------------------------

Home prices post record decline

A government study finds home prices fell 1.7% in the first quarter of 2008. California, Nevada see sharpest drop.


housing2.03.jpg
Compared to the first quarter of 2007, home prices fell 3.1% in the first quarter of 2008.

Washington, D.C. -- The prices of homes sold in the first quarter of 2008 posted a record decline, according to a new report from the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight.

Home prices fell 3.1% from the first quarter of 2007, the largest decline in the purchase-only index, which excludes refinancings, since the agency began keeping records 17 years ago.

First-quarter prices dropped 1.7% from the fourth quarter, the largest quarterly dip ever.

"It's not going to be the largest decline on record for long," said Peter Schiff, president and chief global strategist at Euro Pacific Capital."Prices are going to keep falling until we get to the equilibrium, which is much, much lower. This is only the beginning."

The inflation-adjusted price of homes fell 7.7% on a year-over-year basis. At the same time, the prices of other goods and services rose 4.6%, according to OFHEO.

"The nominal price declines aren't as spectacular as they would be if we didn't have so much inflation," Schiff said. "Houses are becoming a less valuable asset relative to the cost of living."

OFHEO reported that prices fell in 43 states, with eight states seeing quarterly price declines of more than 3%. California and Nevada were the biggest losers, with home prices falling more than 8% in both states.

Prices on all transactions, including homes sales and refinancings, fell 0.2%year-over-year and remained flat compared to the fourth quarter, OFHEO reported.

California, Nevada, Florida, Arizona and Michigan exhibited the greatest price depreciation in all transactions in the first quarter. Wyoming, Utah, Montana, Texas and Alabama saw prices for all transactions increase the most. To top of page





Blogged with MessageDance using Gmail

Bank failures to surge in coming years



IndyMac, Corus, UCBH under pressure as credit crunch slows economy

By Alistair Barr, MarketWatch
Last update: 6:27 p.m. EDT May 23, 2008
SAN FRANCISCO (MarketWatch) -- By April, Gary Holloway was almost three years into retirement.
He'd built a new home by a lake in Texas, bought a boat and was working on his golf game. While taking on some part-time work, Holloway also traveled for months across the U.S. with his wife, from Seattle to Washington D.C., catching up with old friends and family.
That life of leisure abruptly changed about six weeks ago when Holloway got a phone call from his former employer, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., or FDIC, which regulates U.S. banks and insures deposits.

Holloway, a 30-year FDIC veteran, had worked extensively with failed lenders in Houston during the savings and loan crisis in the late 1980s and early 1990s, when thousands of thrifts collapsed.
Earlier this year, the FDIC began trying to lure roughly 25 retirees like Holloway back to prepare for an increase in bank failures. It's also hiring about 75 new staff.
Holloway quickly went back to work. ANB Financial N.A., a bank in Bentonville, Ark. with $2.1 billion in assets and $1.8 billion in customer deposits, was failing and an expert like Holloway was needed to value the assets and find a stronger institution to take them on.
"I was very excited about coming back," Holloway said in an interview. "I'm now 57. There's still a lot of life left and the juices are flowing again."
On May 9, life for ANB ended when the FDIC and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, another bank regulator, announced that the lender was closing. See full story.
Only three banks have failed so far in 2008. But that number is set to surge as the credit crunch slows economic growth and hammers some lenders that grew too fast during the recent real-estate boom, experts say.
The roots of today's banking crisis grew out of the boom and bust in the real estate market. Lenders originated more and more mortgages, while other banks, particularly smaller and medium-sized institutions, ploughed money into construction and development loans.
'You don't avoid the problem. It's too late to wait and hope that things get better.'
— Joseph Mason, Drexel University
While loan growth soared in 2004 and 2005, most regulators failed to scrutinize many banks or restrain this heady expansion of credit. Now that the loans have been made and delinquencies are climbing, some banks may already be doomed.
Marriages and managing
"At this point in the crisis, you can't stop bank failures," said Joseph Mason, associate professor of finance at Drexel University's LeBow College of Business, who has studied past financial crises.
"At this point you manage through failures and arrange marriages where another stronger bank takes on the assets and deposits," he said. "You move through the problem. You don't avoid the problem. It's too late to wait and hope that things get better."
Things may get worse before they get better.
At least 150 banks will fail in the U.S. during the next two to three years, according to a projection by Gerard Cassidy and his colleagues at RBC Capital Markets.
'There has been excessive loan growth and some banks won't be able to access capital markets to replace the money that will disappear as credit losses rise.'
— Gerard Cassidy, RBC Capital Markets
If the current economic slowdown deteriorates into a recession on the scale of those from the 1980s and early 1990's, the number of failures will be much higher this time around -- probably as high as 300 of them, by RBC's reckoning.
That's a massive surge compared to the recent boom years of the credit and real estate markets. From the second half of 2004 through end of 2006 there were 10 consecutive quarters without a bank failure in the U.S. -- a record length of time, Cassidy notes.
"This downturn will trigger a significant amount of bank failures relative to the past five years," he said. "There has been excessive loan growth and some banks won't be able to access capital markets to replace the money that will disappear as credit losses rise."
Texas Ratio
Cassidy and his colleagues have developed an early-warning system for spotting future trouble at banks called the Texas Ratio.
The ratio is calculated by dividing a bank's non-performing loans, including those 90 days delinquent, by the company's tangible equity capital plus money set aside for future loan losses. The number basically measures credit problems as a percentage of the capital a lender has available to deal with them.
Cassidy came up with the idea after covering Texas banks in the 1980s. Until the recession hit that decade, many banks in the state were considered some of the best in the country. But as problem assets climbed, that view was cruelly challenged, Cassidy recalls.
The analyst noticed that when problem assets grew to more than 100% of capital, most of the Texas banks in that precarious position ended up going under. A similar pattern occurred in the New England banking sector during the recession of the early 1990s, Cassidy said.
Along with his colleagues, Cassidy applied the same ratio to commercial banks at the end of this year's first quarter and found some disturbing trends.
UCBH Holdings Inc.

http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/story.aspx?guid=%7B2FCA4A0C-227D-48FE-B42C-8DDF75D838DA%7D&print=true&dist=printTop







Blogged with MessageDance using Facebook

Thursday, May 8, 2008

Americans split on homeowner bailout - poll

They are not bailing you out.


Americans remain split on whether homeowners about to default on their mortgages should receive special treatment to help them keep their houses, according to a new CNN/Opinion Research Poll.




Reblogged with MessageDance using Google Reader

Tuesday, May 6, 2008

Countrywide Takes Away Home-Equity Credit Lines in Las Vegas



http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&sid=adSiHtVyQXmc&refer=home

U.S. lenders had $1.1 trillion in home equity loans outstanding as of last year, up 89 percent since 2003, based on the Federal Reserve's Flow of Funds data.

Amid flashing neon signs along the Vegas Strip, residents are losing access to credit that might have financed businesses or bought cars and other goods.

As many as 15,000 people in Las Vegas, or 5 percent of the total homeowner population, had credit lines suspended by Countrywide and other lenders, said Brad Henderson, president of Henderson, Nevada-based mortgage banker and broker Evofi One.

Jerry Tao, a part-time lawyer and spokesman for Evofi One's parent company, lost access to his $50,000 Countrywide line despite earning more than $500,000 last year and having a credit score he says was between 750 and 770.

Replacing Pathfinder

Though he never accessed the line, Tao, 40, said he'd hoped to redo his backyard and replace his 1995 Nissan Pathfinder.

Credit scores are a calculation of the likelihood a person will pay bills based on past history.

Countrywide, the biggest U.S. mortgage lender, stopped extending credit to 122,000 borrowers nationwide whose homes fell below appraised values, a practice permitted by bank regulations, the company said in a statement.

Pasadena, California-based IndyMac and Seattle-based Washington Mutual say they evaluate borrowers individually. Bank of America says it's reviewing all its home-equity credit lines and taking actions permitted by lending agreements.

The Las Vegas housing-market crash represents a turnaround since 2003, when the local economy and real estate were booming.

``If you had anything on the ball, you could make it happen in Vegas,'' said real estate agent Donna Marie Gold, 62, who built a $4.5 million fortune buying and selling properties over six years.

After failing to complete a single sale last year, Gold said she fell $22,000 short each month on payments needed to maintain 14 properties. Now two to four months behind on some mortgage payments, she's lost access to a $250,000 Wells Fargo & Co. equity credit line.

`New York Minute'

``The whole thing was upside down in a New York minute,'' Gold said. ``There needs to be some forgiveness in this climate with regards to credit and rebuilding one's credit.''

John Simon, 42, borrowed $35,000 on low-interest credit cards in 2007 to pay down his $63,000 credit line and save on the 11.75 percent interest he says Countrywide charged. He expected to be able to access the credit line later. When Countrywide froze the line, he wasn't able to get money needed to pay his bills.

``They took away the last amount of cash I had to make all the payments on my father's retirement home,'' Simon said. ``From a business standpoint, this was the stupidest thing I ever did. But it was so easy.''







Blogged with MessageDance using Facebook

Monday, May 5, 2008

The Fed is Getting Desperate



http://www.rgemonitor.com/blog/roubini/252573/

Financial markets – especially the equity markets – have somewhat recovered since the financial markets reached a point of near meltdown around the time of Bear Stearns collapse. But the strains in money markets and credit markets remain severe and show little sign of improvement.

In mid-March – at the peak of the crisis - the Fed did not just partially bail out the Bear Stearns shareholders who would have been totally wiped out in the case of a disorderly collapse of Bear Stearns; more importantly the Fed bailed out JP Morgan that had – like Bear – and still has a massive exposure to the CDS market; it bailed out the creditors of Bear Stearns who would have suffered massive losses if the Fed had not outright bought $29 billion of toxic securities held by Bear; and it bailed out Lehman, Merrill and a good chunk of the shadow financial system as the Bear Stearns bailout – together more importantly with the new TSLF and the PDCF – ensured – for the first time since the Great Depression - that systemically important broker dealers would have access to the lender of last resort support of the Fed.

While the extreme tail risk of a systemic financial meltdown – and we were in mid-March one epsilon away from such a generalized run on most of the shadow banking system – was avoided by the trifecta of the Bear Stearns bailout, the TSLF and the PDCF the stresses in the financial markets – liquidity and credit crunch - remain severe as even the FOMC had to admit in its latest statement.

The severity and persistence of the liquidity crunch is evident from the fact that in the interbank markets spreads relative to Libor remain extremely high and still close to their peaks since this crisis started last summer in spite of 325bps Fed Fund ease by the Fed, in spite of the creation and vast expansion of the TAF auctions (now up to $150 billion over a month), in spite of the creation and extension of the TSLF, in spite of the creation of the PDCF. So now after the Fed has already allowed banks and non banks primary dealers to swap hundreds of billions of dollars of illiquid MBS (and now even any “good quality” ABS), after it has allowed the non bank primary dealers to have access to the Fed discount window on same terms as the banks, it has now decided to allow even non-US banks outside of the US to have access to the liquidity support of the Fed: indeed given the stubborn recalcitrance of term Libor spreads to fall in the US, UK , Europe and around the wor!
ld the
Fed now claims that this stress in money markets is due to the fact that non-US banks are short of dollar liquidity and are thus putting pressure even on the borrowing rates of US banks.

So while foreign banks and foreign primary dealers already present in the US can have access to the Fed liquidity and Treasuries-swap-for-illiquid-assets facilities foreign banks without US operations now also need to be provided with the lender of last resort support of the Fed. How to do that? The Fed just announced a significant increase of its swap facilities with European central banks: the latter will be able to swap their euros, swiss francs, etc. for US dollars and then relend these dollars to their own banks that are structurally short of dollar liquidity. So, via foreign central banks now the Fed will also try to provide its safety net to non-US banks.

So as the stress in interbank markets is showing no sign of relenting the Fed has increasingly resorted to new operations that incrementally increase the number of institutions that have access to its safety net and the nature of its safety net: direct Fed Funds easing of 325bps and parallel sharp reduction of the discount rate; creation and now massive extension of the TAF that provided term liquidity to US banks; creation of the term facility (TSLF) that allowed both banks and non-bank primary dealers to swap illiquid MBS and now ABS for safe and liquid Treasuries; creation of the primary dealers credit facility (PDCF) that vastly extended the lender of last resort support to systemically important non banks (primary dealers); creation and now further extension of swap facilities with foreign central banks that will allow even non-US banks operating abroad to have access to the Fed’s dollar liquidity.

The Fed is getting most creative and desperate as all these facilities have done very little to reduce the liquidity crunch in spite of the fact that now $500 billion out of the $700 billion of safe Treasuries held by the Fed are now committed to be swapped for illiquid assets on the balance sheets of US and non-US banks and non-banks. That is why the Fed recently leaked even more non-orthodox ideas that are being discussed on how to buy even more illiquid assets once it runs out of safe Treasuries to swap: borrowing from the Treasury bonds to be swapped for illiquid MBS/ABS, issuing Fed debt notes (like the sterilization bonds used by some central banks to perform sterilized intervention, paying interest on reserves to potentially massively increase the liquidity available to banks without blowing the monetary base, etc.).

But in spite of all of these interbank spreads – both the Libor-OIS spread and the TED spread – remain stubbornly high and only modestly lower than their recent extreme peaks. Why? Banks and non bank primary having access to the Fed liquidity are hoarding such liquidity and not relending it to the other members of the shadow banking system for two reasons. First, they need that liquidity for themselves as the roll-off of SIV and conduits and concerns about future liquidity needs have led to a massive need for liquidity insurance; second, given the counterparty risk – who is holding the toxic waste and how much of it – that an opaque and non-transparent financial system has created no one trust its counterparties and is willing to lend them money on a term basis. Given this fundamental lack of confidence and trust in counterparties the money markets remain totally clogged and the massive orthodox and non-orthodox actions of the Fed have very little effects. Yes, now in
addition to banks, a dozen non bank primary dealers have access to the Fed liquidity. But thousands of other members of the shadow banking system – SIVs, conduits, money market funds, hedge funds, private equity funds, smaller broker dealers and investment banks – don’t have access to such liquidity. And most of these members of the shadow banking system borrow short and in liquid ways, are highly leveraged and lend or invest in longer terms and more illiquid ways. So they are all subject to liquidity or rollover risk.

So the liquidity crunch remains severe in spite of all of the extreme policy actions by the Fed and other central banks. In forthcoming note we will show why the recent stock market rally is just a bear market sucker’s rally; and why the credit crunch is getting worse rather than getting better. The worst is still ahead of us both for the real economy that is spinning into a more severe recession and for financial markets where unrecognized losses are much larger ahead than the losses that have been already recognized.





Blogged with MessageDance using Facebook

Friday, May 2, 2008

Will Fed Cut Rates Again?



Blogged with MessageDance

April Payrolls Down Less Than Expected: Is the U.S. Labor Market Showing Mixed Recessionary Trends?



Fact-check from http://www.rgemonitor.com/

Large birth/death adjustment (267k), seasonal factors may be inflating the no. of jobs added; unemployment rate down due to increase in household employment; BLS data subject to revisions






Website Snapshot

RGE Monitor

RGE Monitor -



Blogged with MessageDance using Facebook

Friday, April 25, 2008

Let Rome in Tiber melt





Rome did melt into the Tiber. The place was invaded by barbarians...the population sank from over a million to under 100,000. And when the city was “rediscovered” by tourists with a sense of history in the 17th century...there were goats grazing amid the ruins of the ancient city.



There are people who believe that power, progress, and wealth are always on a rising slope. Let them come to Rome!



Roman property was a sell for a period of probably a thousand years...from the peak of Roman power, around 100 AD, down to its nadir, sometime after the Renaissance.



We have come to Rome on your behalf, dear reader. We poke through its dusty ruins looking for the future. There are more ruins to come, we think...



(Oh, the labors we undertake for your sake, dear reader. Last night, trying to get in the spirit of the place, we drank nearly a whole bottle of wine from Abruzzo. Today, we will go with a Tuscan variety...)



But let us first look at the news:



“Does the US matter any more?” The question comes to us from the head of research at Societe Generale . Looking at the data from the International Energy Agency in Paris, reported in this space yesterday, he noticed that now China, Russia, India and the Mideast use more oil than the USA. What’s more, energy use in America is going down...while it is skyrocketing in those other countries. Thanks largely to growing demand in the emerging markets...and the falling value of the U.S. currency...the price of oil hit a new record yesterday – at $118.



The United States matters less and less to the oil market – but is still very important, of course.



We have guessed that the United States of America is a sell. Its money, its paper, its property, its labor, its stocks, its industries, its debt – sell them all.



We don’t mind saying so...still, we don’t like to hear the foreigners say it. A man may have noticed the swelling with his own eyes; still he doesn’t like to hear a stranger say his wife is getting fat. So when the Financial Times comes out with an article saying the same thing, it sticks in our craw.



At least the FT is nice enough to use a euphemism. Instead of seeing the United States on its knees, it sees the “end of unipolarity.” As we all know, when the Soviet Union threw in the towel in 1989, the US was the world’s undisputed hegemon. America was on top of the world – with no real competition. It was a “unipolar” world, as the FT would put it. The stock market boomed. The dollar rose. America’s chest swelled with homegrown pride and the entire world’s credit. And by the late ’90s, President Clinton summed it up: “things couldn’t get better,” he said.









Blogged with MessageDance using Facebook

Bill Bonner from Italy. Air is going somewhere else





From the Financial Times comes the view from the sunny side of the street:



“The optimistic view is based on two distinct elements. First, that the deleveraging process is reaching its natural end as valuations stabilise and institutions come clean about their losses and raise capital; second, that a series of previously unthinkable policy responses have been effective in restoring liquidity to the financial system.



“Both views have merit. Financial institutions, particularly in the US, have recognised the scale of the problem and are taking remedial steps. Just witness the recent round of capital raising by Citigroup, Merrill Lynch, JPMorgan and Wachovia . At the same time central banks in Europe and the US have opened up their financing windows, expanding the size of the financing, the range of institutions that can access it and the list of eligible collateral.”



The report goes on to suggest the alternative...that policy reactions (by the Fed and other central banks) may be “too little, too late.”



And here, we think the writer is wrong on both scores. That is, the real problem is not one that can be fixed by putting more money into the banking system. It’s more basic than that. When a bubble pops, it’s almost impossible to pump it up again. You pump and pump...but the air goes somewhere else. The consequence of the dot.com bubble, for example, was that expectations for the new age of computerized communications were over-bought. New money could be put into the system. But the new money didn’t go into dot.coms. It went into housing and finance. Now, those bubbles have popped too. The authorities are pumping new money into the banking system...but where is it going? We already have plenty of houses in America – more than enough. Don’t expect a boom in the housing industry anytime soon. And take all those leveraged, sophisticated CDOs, MBSs, SIVs, and the rest – please! Who’s going to put more money into those?



No, dear reader, that’s not the way it works. New money looks for a new home...a new bubble to inflate...not one with a hole in it.



Our guess...and again, we warn readers that we are just guessing...is that this inflation is going into gold, commodities, oil...and, yes, emerging markets. Our guess is that the setback for emerging markets is just a correction, not a fundamental shift of direction.



Our guess is that the setback for gold – down below $900 – is also just a correction, not the end of the bull market. Indian stocks...the Vietnamese economy...commodities...gold – all still have a lot of room on the upside.



Our resident commodities guru, Kevin Kerr, couldn’t agree more. “A nasty rumor has been going around that the commodity markets are old hat and will soon go the way of the dinosaur,” says Kevin.



“‘They’ have been saying that since I started on the floor almost 20 years ago. I’m here to tell you that not only are these markets stronger and more modern than ever, but there’s never been a better time than right now for investors like you to make lifestyle-changing profits, and probably more quickly than you ever thought possible. I know, because I’ve done it myself!”









Blogged with MessageDance using Facebook